Candidates on Display,
but what are their Stances on Health and Freedom?
It is political campaign time, full throttle, and it is time to ask whether health freedom issues are being addressed by candidates. After all, political campaigns are a chance to raise the most important issues and, if necessary, correct the course that our government is on. What are candidates saying?
Freedom to access food and water free from toxins.
Access to natural, organic food and clean water might seem to be an obvious plank to have in any candidate’s platform, but what do the candidates actually say about such freedom issues. Isn’t it time for federal and state governments to support the development of smaller organic farms rather than the factory farms of agribusiness with their input of toxic insecticides and pesticides into the food chain and
and their growing of vast amounts of GMO corn and soy? Is such toxic agriculture really the best America can do for feeding its people? What do the candidates say?
And could these candidates please express an opinion about the addition of hazardous industrial fluoride wastes to the water supply (“water fluoridation”). After all, fluoride in the drinking water is being forced on 73% of the American population. At what percentage do you think it might become a basic freedom issue? Let’s ask the candidates. Why has it been necessary for a few non-profit organizations to sue the EPA in a seven-year legal battle in order to get the courts to order a halt to this pernicious governmental fluoridation mandate.